Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 9481 - 9500
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 2:38 pm
Today's decision in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:27 am
Additional Resources: Obama wants to help California create more retirement-savings accounts, July 13, 2015, LA Times More Blog Entries: Arlington v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:57 am
A map of Ring-police partnerships in the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:10 am
The following year the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in State v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:39 am
Gonzalez-Perez, V. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:16 am
District Court for the Central District of California, pursuant to 42 U.S.C., § 1983, a federal statute which provides a remedy for persons who, under color of state law, are deprived of rights, privileges or immunities granted under federal law or the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:45 pm
In Travis v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 am
We believe this action could be a model for future investor claims outside the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:16 am
United States, 135 S. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:08 am
Superior Court of California, Solano Cty., 480 U.S. 102 (1987); Glencore Grain Rotterdam B.V. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:06 pm
United States, which interpreted the Fourth Amendment to impose certain limits on the warrantless collection of the historical cell phone location records of a criminal suspect; (3) Murphy v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:21 pm
"] From Maffick LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:43 am
As the court explained: That practice effectively allowed a deceased judge to exercise the judicial power of the United States after his death. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:50 pm
United States Fish and Wildlife, et al., Case No. 08-CV-01490-AWI-GSA). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 pm
The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit had to grapple with the question of “whether the compelled use of Payne’s thumb to unlock his phone was testimonial,” the ruling in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:41 am
This statement makes it clear that United States Supreme Court has no intention of extending any limitation of employees' claims to legislation such as the Cal. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 10:30 am
But a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit may have changed that forever. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:23 am
Entertainment Merchants Association, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had found that the California law violated the First Amendment, and by a vote of 7 to 2, the Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
