Search for: "C N And R"
Results 9501 - 9520
of 10,663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
& C.4th 25, 27 (Pa. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
& C.4th 25, 27 (Pa. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
Five days left to vote for The Appellate Gourmet(c) Blog! [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Id. at 481 n.12. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
Houston Red C LLC, No. 18-0228 (Tex. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:28 pm
Along with the disruption and the reputational damage, a company experiencing a data breach can also find itself attracting the unwanted attention of regulators. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 9:36 am
Below is the request for rulemaking to eliminate the "evergreen" requirement in amended Rule 144(i). [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
In the United States, there is talk of a backlash against ESG, while in Europe, the number of laws requiring companies to comply with ESG standards is growing steadily. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
Discussion The Sixth Amendment provides that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 7:39 am
Metro-North R. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:24 am
C&C Coupe Family Ltd. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 11:49 am
REC. 30462 (Dec. 10, 1981) (statement by Senator Max Baucus, introducing the Periodic Payment Settlement Act of 1981) ("[I]n many cases because it assumes that injured parties will wisely manage large sums of money so as to provide for their lifetime needs. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 8:56 pm
Pickens, Ernest N. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:30 am
In a ruling from the bench in early August 2012 (read transcript here), the court ordered that, “[i]n light of the fact that petitioner has failed to appear as directed, the proceeding is marked off calendar without prejudice to restore the proceeding to the calendar upon motion on notice, with an affirmation from counsel stating that the matter is ready to proceed. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm
Target (Docket Report) (EDTexweblog.com) Claim amendments in reexamination eliminate patentee’s right to past damages: District Court C D California – Antonious v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
(The Product Naming Blog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court C D California: Federal registration owned by someone else no defense to cybersquatting: Monex Deposit Co. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
Walthers, Inc (Docket Report) (Gray on Claims) District Court C D California: Falsely advertising compliance with patented method constitutes false marking: King Tuna v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 11:04 pm
Among other things, the ALJ held that the Commission had failed to prove that LabMD’s computer data security practices “caused” or “were likely to cause” “substantial consumer injury,” as required under Section 5(n) of the FTC Act. [read post]
