Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 9501 - 9520 of 29,832
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2016, 4:21 pm by Cindy Cohn
The scope is breathtaking, including the ongoing seizure and searching of communications flowing through key Internet backbone junctures,[1]the searching of communications held by service providers like Google and Facebook, and, according to the government's own investigators, the retention of significantly more than 250 million Internet communications per year.[2]  Yet somehow, the NSA and its defenders still try to pass 702 surveillance off as "targeted surveillance,"… [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 9:52 am by Beth Graham
., 823 F.3d at 1159 (“Because the NLRA renders [the defendant’s] arbitration provision illegal, the FAA does not mandate its enforcement. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 6:50 am by scanner1
JIMMY ANDERSON, GLENDA ANDERSON, KRISTIE ANDERSON, JOHN ANDERSON, GLENDA F. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:47 pm by emagraken
 Khalfan expected that the plaintiff would experience appreciable improvement of her symptoms in the future, but was unable to predict with precision the degree to which the plaintiff would recover. f)        Given the fact that the plaintiff has experienced pain for years after the Collision, it is unlikely that she will experience full recovery of all symptoms. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 8:09 pm by Ad Law Defense
Litig., 654 F.3d 935, 947 (9th Cir.2011)). [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 11:21 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Peter Cook, a Defense Department spokesman, said, “we’re going to defend our forces where they are. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:48 pm by A. Brian Albritton
" It is not enough, the Court explained, for Relator to describe a false scheme allegedly committed by the defendants. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:48 pm by A. Brian Albritton
" It is not enough, the Court explained, for Relator to describe a false scheme allegedly committed by the defendants. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 2:14 pm by R. Locke Beatty
  The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently granted permission for a Rule 23(f) appeal of the district court’s order denying class certification on this basis. [read post]