Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 9501 - 9520
of 17,878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
(Miller v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
Justice was served in the sense that the dismissal was ultimately grounded on the legally correct principles, but 8 extra years of litigation is hardly justice being served. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
It’s about time we re-examined the unfashionable idea of marital conduct to see whether justice can ever again form part of matrimonial law. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
It’s about time we re-examined the unfashionable idea of marital conduct to see whether justice can ever again form part of matrimonial law. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:21 pm
Given that the speaker is none other than Sir Richard Arnold, Patents Court judge and the source of some of the most interesting IP matters referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union -- including the copyright behemoth of Case C‑406/10 SAS Institute Inc. v World Programming Ltd (finished off by Arnold J here) -- the event should be a real treat. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:17 am
See Swint v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
., Moore v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 6:06 am
Briefly: At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses Tuesday’s comments by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg suggesting that the Court might decline to grant any of the pending petitions challenging state bans on same-sex marriage because there is currently no division among the circuits. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
By contrast, in Romo v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 1:14 am
See, e.g, In re Boucher, 2009 WL 424718 (D.Vt. 2009). [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Similarly in Pollen v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Solis v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:58 am
The legislative intention has been, in some respects, completely re-sculpted by the courts. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:58 am
Justice Wiggins further concluded, like Wallman, the Board’s conclusions that the petitioner would likely re-offend, primary focus on underlying crimes and its other proffered reasons “are either unsupported by the record, or simply make no sense. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
”[15] Two years later, in Bigelow v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
” Justice Blackmun added that Rules of practice and procedure are devised to promote the ends of justice, not to defeat them. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
” Justice Black added that Rules of practice and procedure are devised to promote the ends of justice, not to defeat them. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:42 pm
General Rule The Supreme Court held in Hormel v. [read post]
