Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 9501 - 9520 of 28,443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2018, 7:34 am
Art 8 of GDPR states that if a child is under age of 16 then it requires parental consent but that this default age for lawful consent may be lowered by individual member states down to minimum of 13. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
First, he mentions the US Supreme Court’s “with all deliberate speed” language from what has become known as Brown II, the Court’s follow-up to its groundbreaking Brown v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:52 pm by William Ford
Bobby Chesney explained a factual dispute related to the merits in Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 7:45 am by Amy Howe
[Editor’s note: An earlier version  of this post ran on February 5, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 1:48 am
 | When passing off is enough to successfully oppose a trade mark |  BREAKING: Sky's the limit for CJEU references in Sky v SkyKick trade mark battle |  Influencers and undisclosed sponsored activities: where do we stand? [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:47 pm by Gene Killian
The fraud coverage issue also recently came up in a federal case in California, Hanover v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 2:47 pm by Gene Killian
The fraud coverage issue also recently came up in a federal case in California, Hanover v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:33 am by Sullivan & Galleshaw, LLP
On Tuesday, February 20, 2018, the New York State Court of Appeals ruled in a 6-0 judge opinion in Heeran v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:57 am
Although it is unclear precisely what standard the Appellate Division applied, it cited its prior decision in Tapp v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:06 pm by Nate Nead
[xi] This level of government assistance for consumers is even higher in European markets where the state-sponsored healthcare systems are more robust. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm by Giles Peaker
Remarkably, on the same day, Hillingdon Legal also replied, saying the housing application was “currently being processed” and had been “passed onto [sic] a medical advisor“. [read post]