Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 9501 - 9520
of 16,403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2013, 12:02 pm
Well, that’s what Bausch v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:30 am
” The French government lawyer Edwige Belliard argued that the law is democratic and backed by "a strong conviction among the French public." [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
It is a criminal case called U.S. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 3:21 am
Interference with work, personnel relationships, or the speaker’s job performance can detract from the public employer’s function, and avoiding such interference can be a strong state interest. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 3:00 am
Ornelas v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 8:23 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 11:43 am
This morning the Court, in a unanimous opinion by Justice Thomas, affirmed the court of appeals in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
In Mendoza v Silva, 2013 WL 6491479 (N.D.Iowa) Plaintiff Maria Guadalupe Aguilar Mendoza, a citizen of Mexico, filed an action to secure the return of her daughters, five-year-old K.G.M.A. and four-year-old M.K.M.A.. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
In Application of Gavia v Hernandez, 2013 WL 6115725 (D. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 3:09 am
In his opinion in Valinote v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:50 am
In Ritchie v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm
He wrote in State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
Further, in NDMC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 6:08 pm
The case is American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
Google makes itself ridiculous, tells appeals court something Microsoft can disprove with transcript
12 Dec 2013, 11:30 am
Today I've become aware of another ridiculously untrue assertion that is almost as bad as what happened in that Apple v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 6:53 am
The case is Small v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
[2] Cojocaru v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:03 am
As stated by the SJC in Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:21 pm
The majority held that New York’s very strong privilege applied. [read post]
