Search for: "Does 1 - 20" Results 9521 - 9540 of 28,828
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2007, 4:01 pm
Some reactions to the expanded ethics charges filed yesterday by the State Bar: 1.) [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 11:48 pm by Stu Ellis
According to the data, 30,000 plants from an April 1 planting will yield about 95 percent as much as 35,000 plants from an April 20 planting. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:23 am
(2) If a seller of goods fails to provide notice in the manner described in paragraph (1), the seller still may assert the rights contained in section 503(b)(9). 11 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:35 am by Giesela Ruehl
Private International Law Evaluated 15:00-15:20   Zhengxin Huo, Associate Professor of CUPL: An Imperfect Improvement: The New Conflict of Laws Act Of The PRC 15:20-15:40   Comments Commentator 1: Prof. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:09 am by CFM Admin
Notwithstanding the foregoing, state registered investment advisers and ERAs (excluding VC Advisers) are not expressly exempt from complying with the CTA, however, this does not preclude any such entity from qualifying for a separate Exemption. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Paul Munter
One of the recent central themes of the Office of the Chief Accountant[1] has been that high-quality audits are foundational to the trust that underlies capital markets.[2] High-quality audits protect investors, instill shareholder confidence in the quality of the financial information, and enable public companies to raise capital efficiently.[3] The investor protection afforded by high-quality audits is as important to U.S. investors in foreign companies that participate in the U.S.… [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:34 am
(2)            If the first question is to be answered in the negative: Does an action in the context of the insolvency to set a transaction aside fall within Article 1(2)(b) of Regulation [No 44/2001]? [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 4:21 am by Will Holder, Olswang LLP
The MOPAC’s appeal on the issue of liability was therefore dismissed. (2) Does liability under the Act extend to consequential losses? [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Dennis Crouch
Hulu – valid: Claims 1–3, 23, and 24 not anticipated; Claims 1–6, 8–11, 13–15, 17–20, 23–25, 29–31, 34–36, and 38–41 not obvious. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:59 am
During her 20 years working in Oregon farmers' markets, she has never heard of a foodborne illness connected to a farm-direct sale in the state. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:31 am by Doorey
 The group of employees met on March 20 and discussed what they had learned. [read post]