Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 9521 - 9540 of 12,455
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2011, 1:36 pm by WIMS
If the subsidy is repealed by July 1, as the amendment calls for, it will save approximately $2.7 billion for the remainder of 2011. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:53 am by Susan Brenner
How does/should a court reconcile Rule 41(g) with the government’s pursuit of criminal forfeiture when the property at issue is intangible, and can therefore be copied? [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:42 am by IP Dragon
” This is not because China does not want later improvements, but it means that China wants that the innovator is acknowledged: article 27 Technology Import & Export Regulations 2002 provides that during the validity of the contract, ownership of improvements in technology shall be vested in the improving party. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 3:34 pm
ABX1 26 does contain some differences from the earlier version, including: Tax increments taken from RDAs in 2011-12 fiscal year would be treated the same as other property tax revenues. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
., May 27, 2011) This reinsurance litigation arose from the alleged breach of Broker Services Agreement (“BSA”) executed by the parties. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
This stipulation does not apply to crimes or offences committed after the extradition. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:41 am by emagraken
., 2011) at p. 705. [27] The duty of an occupier is now governed by s. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:29 am by Rosalind English
To complicate matters further, Article 3(1) of United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child also plays a role. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
" The applicable standard of the Eighth Circuit, in which this case arose, does not differ. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
“Teaching away” does not require that the prior art fore- saw the specific invention that was later made, and warned against taking that path. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Sri Lanka International Extradition Treaty with the United States September 30, 1999, Date-Signed January 12, 2001, Date-In-Force MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 106TH CONGRESS 2d Session SENATE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL THE WHITE HOUSE, June 27, 2000. [read post]