Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 9521 - 9540
of 19,343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
This, I think, doesn’t get Eramo very far. [read post]
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm
., § 15064(b), (g)). [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:58 am
[Mac In Peace] T–Money,” referring to Harrison, the former leader of CAC. [read post]
11 May 2015, 11:01 pm
I won’t be surprised if DOJ appeals it, as it raises a really important set of questions and answers them in some unusual ways. [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm
By quantum entanglement, physicists generally mean a state where two particles, either because of how they were generated or how they have engaged, become a system such that action on one particle affects the other, no matter what the other’s location.[10] Personal data has this quality as well. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:00 am
You are simply not entitled to the protections we give every other limited liability company, no matter how scummy they are, no matter how many people they rip off, no matter how putrid their business model. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:53 am
The result, as I shall explain, is that the Klayman case could affect the current congressional deliberations (a) not at all (if it does not come down before June), (b) atmospherically but not substantively, or (c) by creating one of two possible circuit splits. [read post]
10 May 2015, 9:30 am
When conduct isn’t a search, Congress doesn’t have to “approve” it first: If Congress wants to allow it freely, it can do (and usually does) nothing. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:26 pm
AT&T (Fed. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:03 pm
See Susan B. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am
Div., 1987), rv’d on other grounds, sub.nom., Matter of Baby M, 109 N.J. 396 (1988). [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:56 pm
Victor T. [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:56 pm
Victor T. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. [read post]
7 May 2015, 10:35 am
Today’s decision rules that the text of Section 215 does not authorize the program as a matter of statutory law. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:38 am
§ 717(b). [read post]
7 May 2015, 4:00 am
(This article is adapted from Steven B. [read post]
6 May 2015, 12:27 pm
B & C Management Vermont, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 9:15 am
Stamer also is a widely published author, management policy advocate and thought leader, and management policy advocate on these and other workforce and related matters who shares her experience and leadership in a wide range of contexts. [read post]
