Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 9521 - 9540 of 178,515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Circuit Court of Appeals in the civil rights action was the question of whether the §75 disciplinary hearing officer’s finding that there was a sufficient and legitimate basis for Plaintiffs termination precluded* the Plaintiff from relitigating those issues in federal district court. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:36 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Supreme Court’s Opinion The Supreme Court held that plaintiffs stipulation should not have made any difference in determining whether the case met the CAFA’s thresholds for removal. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 5:47 am by Eugene Volokh
(IStock) Can someone be liable for “intentional interference with business relations” for accurately informing people about facts about the plaintiff, which then leads them to stop doing business with the plaintiff? [read post]
3 Jul 2006, 6:08 am
The Defendant, while pursuing the Plaintiff for a debt, apparently disclosed the Plaintiff's social security number to the defendant's nefarious niece. [read post]
3 Jul 2006, 6:08 am
The Defendant, while pursuing the Plaintiff for a debt, apparently disclosed the Plaintiff's social security number to the defendant's nefarious niece. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 9:42 pm
It's not looking too good for plaintiff's lawyers. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 8:34 am by Stephen Gillers
Why would the court opt to "protect" the defendant on plaintiff's motion? [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:56 am by Dave Abels
The court denied the defendant’s motion but ultimately dismissed the plaintiffs complaint. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 8:28 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Plaintiff's lawsuit against the HMO arose out of a denial of the Plaintiff's request for continued physical therapy treatments.This case may also be viewed at http://www.aopc.org/OpPosting/Superior/out/A23044_09.pdf.Source: Pennsylvania Law Weekly "Case Digests" (2/1/10). [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:20 pm by The Docket Navigator
During a deposition, plaintiff's in-house counsel "expanded on the statements to the PTO, revealing that because of the issue of the different effective filing dates, there was a specific concern that the mixed subject matter claims were technically anticipated by [plaintiff's] publication of [another application]. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:09 am by The Docket Navigator
In recommending that plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction be granted, the magistrate judge found that plaintiff had established a likelihood of irreparable harm. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 9:55 am by Baumgartner Law Firm
The defense in the in the case claimed the accident was the plaintiff's fault and that plaintiffs damages did not amount to what was claimed by the Baumgartner law firm. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:27 am by R. David Donoghue
Judge Manning granted in part plaintiffs' motion to reconsider the Court's opinion granting defendants summary judgment on plaintiffs' patent claims and dismissing plaintiffs' related state law claims for lack of supplemental jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 3:22 pm
The plaintiffs settled their individual claims with T-Mobile, signing a stipulated judgment that purported to reserve the plaintiffs' right to appeal the District Court's denial of conditional certification. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:27 am by R. David Donoghue
Judge Manning granted in part plaintiffs' motion to reconsider the Court's opinion granting defendants summary judgment on plaintiffs' patent claims and dismissing plaintiffs' related state law claims for lack of supplemental jurisdiction. [read post]