Search for: "UNITED STATE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT" Results 9521 - 9540 of 36,412
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
Sims, the Court expanded the scope of the principle of population equality to state legislative districts. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 11:01 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Third Circuit“review[s] de novo a district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of CivilProcedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 10:32 am by Aaron Mackey
Unfortunately, earlier this week a federal district court in California disagreed. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:22 am by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
On March 27, United States District Court for the District of Columbia Judge James Boasberg ruled that Department of Health & Human Services Secretary Azar’s approval of work and community engagement requirements in Arkansas and Kentucky were arbitrary and capricious, halting their implementation. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:47 pm by Matthew Moriarty
United States—in which the Court of Federal Claims held that the SBA’s interpretation of its own regulation was “draconian and perverse,” but nonetheless within the SBA’s authority—could go the other way. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 7:25 am by Steven Cohen
Nasher-Alneam – United States District Court – Southern District of West Virginia – March 25th, 2019) involves a criminal complaint against a physician. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:49 pm by Florian Mueller
It's just about vindication and probably meant to be a signal to the appeals court (the Federal Circuit) that Qualcomm hasn't given up. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:21 pm by Florian Mueller
Sabraw of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California still has to adjudicate Apple's motion(s) for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL). [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:51 pm by Scott Bomboy
United States that invalidated the Affordable Care Act’s remaining parts. [read post]
R.S. 30:10(A)(3) is not absurd.[21] Although the Johnson case provides one federal district court’s interpretation on an issue of first impression, it raises more unanswered questions for unit operators in Louisiana. [read post]
R.S. 30:10(A)(3) is not absurd.[21] Although the Johnson case provides one federal district court’s interpretation on an issue of first impression, it raises more unanswered questions for unit operators in Louisiana. [read post]
R.S. 30:10(A)(3) is not absurd.[21] Although the Johnson case provides one federal district court’s interpretation on an issue of first impression, it raises more unanswered questions for unit operators in Louisiana. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:06 am by Christopher Walker
Rachel Kovner, representing the United States as amicus curiae in support of Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, brought much clarity to the argument. [read post]
In March of 2018, the Ninth Circuit Court reversed a decision by the United States District Court for the District of Nevada that tossed claims brought by customers affected by the data breach who claimed that the breach left them in “imminent” risk, because they did not allege having already suffered financial losses. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 6:48 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
In a ruling last year, a federal district court agreed that the penalty-less mandate is unconstitutional and that (as a consequence) the entire ACA must fall. [read post]