Search for: "Does, 1-20" Results 9541 - 9560 of 27,660
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Industry group leaders cited language in Measure 1 that prevents lobbyists from giving gifts to public officials. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by Giles Peaker
As set out above, unfitness does not have an HHSRS Category 1 or Category 2 assessment. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 12:29 pm by Steve Vladeck
That the Supreme Court has such powers, however, does not mean that it likes to use them. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 10:14 am by Eric B. Meyer
UPDATED 12/20/18, 1:00 PM: I misread the Ninth Circuit decision that I’m about to reference below. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:34 am by Joel Cockerell
Having regard to the relative culpability and causative potency of the faults of the respective vessels, Teare J held that Ever Smart should bear 80 per cent of the liability for the collision and Alexandra 1, 20 per cent. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:05 am by Michael Geist
The bill received royal assent on December 13, 2018.Moreover, the copyright provisions in the Canada-US-Mexico Agreement significantly alter the copyright balance by extending the term of copyright by additional 20 years beyond our current law and the international standard found in the Berne Convention. [read post]
In any event, a fair reading of LLCL 702 demonstrates that an application to dissolve 1545 LLC does not flow from a claim under LLCL 411. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 8:04 am by Dan Harris
Let me explain with the following three examples, necessarily a bit vague to camouflage all parties: 1. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 8:04 am by Dan Harris
Let me explain with the following three examples, necessarily a bit vague to camouflage all parties: 1. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
The degree to which state tax provisions conform to the federal Internal Revenue Code (IRC) varies, as does the version of that code to which they conform. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 5:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Fremont (2018) 25 Cal.App.5th 1129, my August 20, 2018 post on which can be found here), context was obviously important in this case. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 3:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  This means that a Section 17(b) violation does not require a finding of fault (such as negligence or tortious intent). [read post]