Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 9541 - 9560
of 12,727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2025, 9:46 pm
Chief Justice John G. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
The Court did not issue a formal opinion, but some justices explained that the decision was intended to urge lower courts to limit the scope of their rulings when issuing temporary injunctions that prevent a state from enforcing a law. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 10:48 pm
(And remember we're talking about a legal system - theory is what counts.) [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 11:25 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court agreed with the Plaintiffs (that court’s opinion is available here). [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:29 am
He responded with, “they’re precedent. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:36 pm
Two other Justices who had not been appointed when Harris was decided are Roberts and Alito. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:54 pm
One interchange in the oral argument that was interesting does relate to the “regulated media” aspect: JUSTICE GINSBURG: You are saying that the standard can still be symbolic, as Justice Scalia said. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy reiterated this same point just two years ago in a concurring opinion in Kerry v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:59 pm
They're only children. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:17 am
Chettiar serves as national legislative counsel coordinating the Initiative, and is incoming Director of the Justice Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 8:20 am
How about John Bradley losing re-election, would that democratic rebuke be enough? [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 2:19 am
#55 Ben Cowgill's SoloBlawg#56 Point of Law#57 Lawyerlike#58 Tech Law Advisor#59 Memorial Day Special#60 The Trademark Blog#60 Professor Kingsfield#61 Blonde Justice#62 New World Man#63 The Airport Lawyer#64 How Appealing#65 What About Clients? [read post]
14 May 2010, 10:47 pm
In that closely-watched case, see slip opinion in Caperton v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:57 am
As related by Presiding Justice James J. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm
” In its first opinion of the term, the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:30 am
Though their visions of justice may vary quite a bit. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 3:02 am
And most recently in an opinion by Justice Kavanaugh, the Court reaffirmed the same standard. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 12:18 pm
First, Justice Genovese explained that the open and obvious inquiry has no bearing on the question of duty. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:16 pm
In this regard, the Detroit Free Press recently reported that Matty Moroun, his wife, his son, and his son's wife, gave the maximum amount of money allowed under Michigan law in June to the re-election campaigns of Republican-nominated justices. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 5:21 pm
The parties will file a new brief to the Court explaining their positions if four of the nine justices choose to hear the case. [read post]
