Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 9541 - 9560
of 15,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2013, 12:35 pm
The case is Kransky v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 9:25 am
Maryland:Committee members discussed prosecutors’ training with Judge Barbara Hervey, who manages the state’s grant program for the Court of Criminal Appeals that provides prosecutors with the bulk of their training. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
This requirement stems, in part, from Diamond v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 7:38 am
Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 7:14 pm
See Loving v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 11:32 am
The legal community is still buzzing about the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 11:08 am
Kitch, Graham v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 5:19 pm
Inventio AG v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
Some legislators want the DMV to study putting barcodes and/or RFIDs on license plates, as reported here. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:34 am
It replaced a hodgepodge of state laws that were an inheritance from the colonies’ English forebears. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
Perry, the challenge to California Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 6:01 pm
On one hand, participants need to understand what they’re getting into when they join a study like this. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 7:37 am
He throws in calls for NASA efforts to clean up orbital debris and study near Earth objects. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 3:22 pm
An EMG study revealed damage and irritation not only to the spinal cord, but to the nerves of the spinal cord. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:59 pm
Two are particularly relevant for this study. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
To understand why the federal guidelines for drug offenses need to be revised, read Judge Gleeson’s full opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
At our hearing, it is not known whether judgment was rendered in this case, nor has taken cognizance; officers of the civil court would have however stated that judgment had been pronounced against him. [10] He wants to learn at the same time he read the decisions on these two claims, “to challenge” he adds. [13] Mr. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
At our hearing, it is not known whether judgment was rendered in this case, nor has taken cognizance; officers of the civil court would have however stated that judgment had been pronounced against him. [10] He wants to learn at the same time he read the decisions on these two claims, “to challenge” he adds. [13] Mr. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am
George King of the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order in Pedroza v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
Supreme Court supporting the Respondents in American Express Company v. [read post]
