Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 9541 - 9560 of 24,129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2017, 8:11 am by Marty Miller
Our decision applies only to [cameras] for which the United States patent right has been exhausted by first sale in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am by NCC Staff
Bush in 2003, placed a temporary restraining order (TRO) on the executive order until full arguments in the case brought against the Trump administration by Washington State and Minnesota could be heard. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
This drastic increase of more than 700 percent firmly secures women’s place as the fastest growing prison population and highlights the urgent need for a gender-responsive, trauma-informed approach to female incarceration in the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am by Jordan Brunner
Yes, this week, the Ninth Circuit decided to temporarily leave in place the nationwide injunction on President Trump’s ban on entry to the United States from seven Muslim countries. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am by Jordan Brunner
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:32 am by Joy Waltemath
Under the state secrets doctrine, the appeals court began, “the United States may prevent the disclosure of information in a judicial proceeding if ‘there is a reasonable danger’ that such disclosure ‘will expose military matters which, in the interest of national security, should not be divulged. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:24 am by David Post
The Government has pointed to no evidence that any alien from any of the countries named in the Order has perpetrated a terrorist attack in the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See, for example, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v United States, 491 U.S. 617, 623 n. 3, 109 S Ct 2646, 105 L. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:15 pm by EEM
News:The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a unanimous ruling in the case of State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:21 pm
 Hence the decision on the Due Process Clause.Going forward, the hardest part of the plaintiff's case remains the validity of the order with respect to people who've never been in the United States, since those individuals have more limited rights under the Due Process Clause. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 1:02 pm by Joe Rosenbaum
 That effort was derailed by a series of court decisions, culminating in a 9-3 en banc decision of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which then led to the State of New Jersey petitioning the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 11:44 am by Eugene Volokh
After hearing the motion, the Court directed the file be sent to the United States Attorney for investigation. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:22 am by Paul Rosenzweig
(v) Effective immediately, it is the policy of the United States to build a more modern, more secure, and more resilient Executive Branch IT architecture. [read post]