Search for: "English v. English"
Results 9561 - 9580
of 11,202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2010, 10:28 pm
, I finally found the time to read the Supreme's new decision in Kentucky v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 6:00 pm
In English law, final injunctions preventing publication of libels are routinely granted to successful claimants after a trial but interim injunctions are almost unheard of (because of the operation of the rule against prior restraint – the so-called “rule in Bonnard v Perryman). [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:58 am
The case is Hatfield v TCN Channel 9 [2010] NSWCA 69. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:59 am
SEC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:49 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:34 am
Higgins' sentencing is set for August 9 at 9:30 a.m. before Judge James V. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 5:20 am
(quoting Garcia v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 10:57 am
But English is a second language at the USPTO. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:10 am
The Judge examined the European and English authorities, and spell out the obligation for authorities: 51. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:23 pm
Today’s case (Horne Coupar v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm
Other countries’ FoI laws, such as the English and Scottish laws recognize two types of exemptions: absolute and relative. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:08 am
The current (April 2010) issue of Sweet & Maxwell's European Trade Mark Reports (click here for details) carries reports on various important recent trade mark cases, the first of which is an English translation of the ruling of the Court of Appeal of 's Hertengebosch in Revillon Chocolatier v Trianon Chocolatiers BV. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am
Dear ColleaguesI hope you find useful to have the links to the new issue of OPINIO JURIS in COMPARATIONE. once again we look forward to host contribution from our Juris Diversitatis group.If you have problems to read the post, please let me know.With my bestsciaoGiovanni #ssrnholder { font-face: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; } #ssrnholder #outline{ border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; border-color: #003366; max-width: 700px; } #ssrnholder table{ max-width: 700px;} #ssrnholder… [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:07 pm
The Act does not grant the holder the windfall of both monopoly and reimbursement for its maintenance.Description: The Boston Tea Party, protesting the English tax on tea. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 5:45 pm
The Fourth Section deals with English cases and its defamation and privacy decisions are of immediate relevance to English lawyers. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 10:03 am
In the landmark 2006 case, Hamdan v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:49 am
The question of publication by hyperlinking has not been specifically considered by the English courts. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:46 am
,et al, and others similarly situated v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 10:45 am
In Renico v. [read post]
