Search for: "People v. House"
Results 9561 - 9580
of 12,879
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2011, 6:14 am
Cal. 2004), and Gonzales v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:56 am
In yet another decision demonstrating that a judge whose career was spent prosecuting can show the fortitude to suppress, Brooklyn Justice Mark Dwyer rejected the testimony of NYC Police Officer Robert McNamara, who falsely claimed consent to justify a search of an apartment to locate a weapon.In People v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
St Marylebone Property Co [1962] 2 WLR 1020 : [1962] 2 All ER 288 can be considered where House of Lords referring to Taylor v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am
“The point of copyright protection is to encourage people to create things that will ultimately belong to the public. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm
EPA failed to conduct its proper due diligence and now the American people will be forced to pay the price. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
That case, State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
., v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:47 pm
‘[1] Foremost, the Act aims to encourage more people to apply to adopt and build confidence in the adopter assessment process. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:38 pm
Two people so handicapped do not, in fact, cancel each other out. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:18 am
The recent case of the United States of America v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm
And the Durham brief doesn’t mention that at least one of her “physical descriptions” from the March 16 meeting didn’t match any player on the lacrosse team, while those descriptions also didn’t even remotely resemble at least two of the people ultimately charged. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 7:27 pm
See, e.g., Anderson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:45 pm
Yesterday, I discussed the case of Jane Doe v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
Bah v The United Kingdom - 56328/07 [2011] ECHR 1448 This is a decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the regulations for eligibility for housing support, after the declaration of incompatibility in Westminster v Morris [2005] EWCA Civ 1184. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
Bah v The United Kingdom - 56328/07 [2011] ECHR 1448 This is a decision of the European Court of Human Rights on the regulations for eligibility for housing support, after the declaration of incompatibility in Westminster v Morris [2005] EWCA Civ 1184. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:00 pm
Are “fat” people covered under the ADA? [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 11:06 am
People buy the towels (we’ve got one at my house), they wave them at games, and the school gets money. [read post]
