Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 9561 - 9580
of 16,410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 1:31 am
That doesn't apply to Samsung's infringement of Apple's intellectual property.This weekend I read the most off-base comment ever on the state of the dispute. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:49 pm
"The Constitution does not permit states to pass overbroad and vague statutes that threaten protected speech. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:46 pm
Seltzer v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:33 am
That decision relied on the Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
Prince v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 4:01 pm
District Court in the case of Texas v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
Herzfeld v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:14 am
Reversed and remanded to the district court for further proceedings.Case Name: MICHAEL JESSE MUNOZ v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:16 am
In re: Z.Z. et al; K.Z. and V.Z. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
The court found in favor of the party that had sold the assets, holding that the exception applied to sale to more than one person. 13.751 Similarly, ION Geophysical Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Akif Khan, a minor v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:30 am
For example, the OFFCP’s fact sheet for employers states that “American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Black, and Hispanic individuals are considered minorities for purposes of the Executive Order. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
He reasoned that (with one minor and non-material exception) the guidance regulated the position of the sponsor and not that of the migrant. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:02 pm
In a fifty-four-page filing Monday evening, state officials cited the Supreme Court’s June 25 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:45 am
This test was considered in the House of Lords in British Coal Corporation v Smith and others [1996] ICR 515. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:34 pm
More recently, in the 2008 military commission case of U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 7:34 am
The case is Lester v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 2:47 am
This is downright absurd.The European Union is undoubtedly a neutral jurisdiction in the Apple v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:31 pm
While we’re on the subject of alcohol and rational deliberation (presuming at least a process of ‘democratic deliberation within’ before casting one’s vote), Elster also notes that in Tanner v. [read post]
