Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 9561 - 9580
of 40,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2014, 1:33 am
The United States Supreme Court (USSC) is today hearing oral arguments in Alice Corp v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 1:44 pm
EFF Files Amicus Brief on Behalf of Tech Pioneers in Oracle v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
Let's see what the Secretary for State says.Something to read? [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:11 am
The case is Simmons v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:16 am
Following yesterday's Supreme Court opinion in Maryland v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 12:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:46 am
But, this bill goes significantly further by stating that a pregnant worker does not have to “accept an accommodation that the employee chooses not to accept. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 2:57 am
SY Custom, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 2:11 pm
" Footnote 2 cites to Nautilus v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 1:36 pm
For those of you looking to comment on the Pearson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:42 am
" The Court of Appeals rejected the City's argument, explaining that "Scope of employment," "discharge of duties" and similar phrases have long been regarded as interchangeable, citing Joseph v City of Buffalo, 83 NY2d 141. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:12 am
Instead, read Wittemyer v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:14 am
As stated earlier, Mr. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 12:00 am
Although Supreme Court had granted NYPD's cross motion, the Appellate Division reversed the lower court's ruling.Initially addressing NYPD's challenge to Petitioner's standing to maintain this action, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Fleisher v New York State Liq. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Although Supreme Court had granted NYPD's cross motion, the Appellate Division reversed the lower court's ruling.Initially addressing NYPD's challenge to Petitioner's standing to maintain this action, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Fleisher v New York State Liq. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:39 am
Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:39 am
Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
Truth on the Market also invites academics, practitioners, and other antitrust/regulation commentators to send us 1,500-4,000 word responses for potential inclusion in the symposium.] [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:26 am
Louis medical malpractice lawyer, I thought this had an interesting result in Devitre v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 4:28 am
The United States Supreme Court finally cleaned up the debris left from its groundbreaking decision three years ago in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
