Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 9561 - 9580
of 11,378
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2010, 9:07 pm
*Yolanda Vazquez (University of Pennsylvania)Saturday May, 298:15am to 10:00am Criminal Law 06--Criminal Procedure: Adjudication 3110 Building: Renaissance, Room: tba 10Chair: Adam M Gershowitz (University of Houston)Judging DWI Trials: The Case for Eliminating the Right to Jury Trialsfor Misdemeanor DWI Cases*Adam M Gershowitz (University of Houston)Double Jeopardy and Mixed Verdicts*Lissa Griffin (Pace University)Jury… [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:06 am
The state could, he suggests, provide that a “loser pays” provision could only be adopted by shareholder vote. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
Even though Prop 47 legislation has only existed for about nine months, the state’s drug courts continue to see a tremendous impact. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
Even though Prop 47 legislation has only existed for about nine months, the state’s drug courts continue to see a tremendous impact. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:41 am
" In 2008, he apparently fled to California, "seeking asylum, leaving the garden state for the pot friendly environs of Los Angeles. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
(Significantly, the plaintiffs do not contend that federal law bars a state from accepting and counting early ballots—those that arrive prior to Election Day, a claim the Fifth Circuit had already rejected in a 2000 case.)As noted above, the district court granted summary judgment to the state defendants. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 11:34 am
For example, may a State bar a resident of that State from traveling to another State to obtain an abortion? [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 10:26 am
When a 2005 California Supreme Court decision held that an arbitration clause that included a class action waiver in a consumer contract was unconscionable, Discover Bank v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:20 pm
The California Supreme Court hasn’t decided whether a delayed discovery rule applies to UCL claims, and the courts of appeal are divided, but the instant court of appeal had already held that—at least for UCL claims based on deceptive practices where the harm wouldn’t reasonably be discovered until a future date—the period starts to run only when a reasonable person would have discovered the factual basis for the claim. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:59 pm
In other legal news involving Miranda warnings, the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda warnings are not a bar to the police requestioning a suspect even after they have invoked the right to a lawyer. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:24 pm
by Harvey Rosenfield, Founder of Consumer Watchdog, author of Proposition 103 Yesterday's oral argument before the California Supreme Court considered the question of whether the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), one of the state's two principal consumer protection laws, applies to the sale of an insurance policy. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court in McCutcheon v. [read post]
Youngblood v. Irell & Manella: The Law Firm Fights BackFirm denies claims and moves for arbitration.
15 Aug 2011, 3:54 pm
Concepcion, in which the Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act preempted certain aspects of California state contract law.But the Irell motion to compel arbitration does contain some discussion of what the firm asserts is actually going on here as a factual matter. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 3:07 am
Maryland Long ago, back in 1963, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Brady v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm
When I put up posts, or moderate comments, I’m not acting on behalf of the state of California (even though blogging is part of my job, for which I get some modest credit in my job evaluations, much as professors who write op-eds are given some credit for such “service” to the public); likewise for Trump. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Martin Singer is a California attorney subject to the California Code of Professional Conduct (CPC). [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
Under the court’s reasoning, state-provided counsel are required in some circumstances, but not others. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:03 am
With almost 15,000 people sitting for the California bar each year, approximately 6,900 newly inaugurated attorneys will be eligible to enter the state's legal market. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the Cato Institute could not have the court hear its claim that court-ordered settlements with the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 9:49 am
Captain Elizabeth Cameron Hernandez, The United States Army Reserve: Welcome to the Hotel California, We Are All Just Prisoners Here, 12 Roger Williams U. [read post]
