Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 9561 - 9580 of 21,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
And the United States Supreme Court and courts of other states have treated the right as extending beyond firearms. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:50 pm by Rick Garnett
Today, he is a litigant in the Supreme Court of the United States and regarded by many as embodying the tension – increasingly, the conflict – between religious conscience and equality. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:30 am
  Answering all of these "difficult questions at the core of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence" in the negative (and suppressing all seized evidence) in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:42 am by Big Tent Democrat
This question may go up the ladder of appeals, but I doubt it will be as a result of an appeal by the United States Trustee for the judicial district (though the United States Trustee in the Sommers case discussed in my linked post was appealed) , which is under the supervision of the Department of Justice. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:11 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Fla. 2019), the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida explained that what constitutes “outrageous” conduct is a question of law. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 3:57 pm
Section 272 of title 35 provides that the temporary presence of a patented invention in the United States, if used exclusively for the needs of a vessel, aircraft, or vehicle, "shall not constitute infringement. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:30 am
First a word about the plaintiff: Some Kat readers may recall that Pom Wonderful prevailed in a closely watched decision given by the United States Supreme Court on June 12, 2014, Pom Wonderful LLC v Coca Cola Company. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:39 am by Michael Risch
To the contrary, the entirely extraterritorial production, use, or sale of an invention patented in the United States is an independent, intervening act  that, under almost all circumstances, cuts off the chain of causation initiated by an act of domestic infringement.So, Power Integrations comes out the same way.Carnegie Mellon v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:42 am by Bartolus
The Court of Justice held that the British measures were too strict and that member States are not required by Article 2 of Regulation 881/2002 to freeze payments to spouses on the grounds only that the spouse lives with the designated person and that person may or will use some of those payments to pay for goods or services which he will consume or benefit from. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:16 am
I invite you to think about these reasons for prosecuting crime when you think about the Seventh Circuit's recent case of United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
For reasons that confound, the employer decided it was a good idea to challenge the removal petition - the case originated in State court - on the grounds that removal jurisdiction violated Article I, § 10 of the United States Constitution - the so-called impairment-of-contracts clause. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
 "It's always good to be transparent," he said.While the cantaloupe-growing season begins in April, a draft of new national food safety rules is not expected until around August 1.The U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States Donald Trump is to claim presidential immunity in a defamation case brought against him by former contestant on the Apprentice who accused him of unwanted sexual contact. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 9:15 pm
The Sisters of Bon Secours in the United States, Incorporated v. [read post]