Search for: "Ball v. State"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Ball State Univesity. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
Rauen v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Or are none of these things relevant because your job is calling balls and strikes, not statecraft? [read post]
30 May 2011, 3:21 am
The Spectator reports that the Secretary of State for education Michael Gove intends to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:47 pm
PHH v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 10:34 am
Por: Víctor Manuel Guízar López INTERNET HAS BECOME A TOOL THAT HAS UNIMAGINABLY REDESIGNED THE MEANS BY WHICH HUMAN BEINGS COMMUNICATE AND HAS TURNED OUT TO BE THE PURE EMBODIMENT OF GLOBALIZATION. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 1:44 pm
At first glance, Coventry Health Care v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 10:41 am
Even Ball State’s attorneys thought it was too employer-friendly. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:59 pm
Nakashima (1991) 231 CA3d 367, 384 [holding affirmative defenses must plead facts sufficient to state a defense to avoid demurrer]; Wyshak v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:59 pm
Nakashima (1991) 231 CA3d 367, 384 [holding affirmative defenses must plead facts sufficient to state a defense to avoid demurrer]; Wyshak v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 5:10 am
Memphis totally dominated Mississippi statistically but still lost 23-21, not being able to put the ball into the end zone and turning the ball over five times. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
After all, Missouri v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
They were: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330 Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256 Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223… [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm
United States 23-310Issue: Whether the administrative law principles articulated in Kisor v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:01 am
They appear, on the face of the decision to have been the most on the ball. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm
The Ol' Balls and Strikes Roberts? [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Koosh Ball, for example, had its registration for copyright rejected by the Copyright Office, and on appeal, the DC Circuit held that the Office had not abused its discretion.11 But in most cases, separability would not be an issue since plaintiffs would be asserting copyright protection over labelling or packaging rather than the good itself. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Koosh Ball, for example, had its registration for copyright rejected by the Copyright Office, and on appeal, the DC Circuit held that the Office had not abused its discretion.11 But in most cases, separability would not be an issue since plaintiffs would be asserting copyright protection over labelling or packaging rather than the good itself. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:59 am
State, 160 P.3d 507 (Mont. 2007); Gamble v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 9:40 am
Microsoft Corp v. i4i Ltd. [read post]
