Search for: "Big 5 Corp" Results 941 - 960 of 1,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2009, 1:05 pm by bradhendrickslawfirm
Here’s the short list: 1) When They Have Nothing to Lose 2) Before Divorce 3) Lots of Medical Bills 4) Credit Cards Out of Control 5) Mortgage Problems & Foreclosure 1) NOTHING TO LOSE As personal injury attorneys, you likely represent several clients each year who have a modest settlement coming their way, but medical bills and liens will prevent them from seeing even a penny of the proceeds. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 11:09 pm
Recommend (4) Report abuse danwun wrote: April 1, 2009 5:15 Congratulations, Economist! [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Newspapers Journalism and Regulation The Press Gazette had a piece “News Corp strikes ‘landmark’ Facebook News deal in Australia”. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
 Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
 Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
If the plaintiff's claim of a violation is predicated upon an interpretation of a statutory or regulatory provision, and that interpretation is contrary to how the FDA reads the same provision, that's just as big a conflict as demanding a warning that the FDA doesn't want the manufacturer to give. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 8:01 am by Christopher Gorman
While recent research suggests that Defense is a top employer of technical talent, the department is underutilizing its expertise and having difficulty cultivating a skilled corps in AI. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:11 am by Gritsforbreakfast
., Equal Justice Under Law, although they’re changing to a new name, Civil Rights Corp, and the law firm Sussman Godfrey in Houston who are great partners in all of this. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South Africa): (Afro-IP), 15-16 September: US ACI 10th advanced forum on biotech patents… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360)   Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons)     Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian Trade… [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
“Bribery” of Witnesses; Obstruction of Justice; Witness Tampering In defining “racketeering activity,”[5] the federal RICO statute expressly refers to certain offenses that pertain to the administration of justice, including obstruction of justice,[6] witness tampering,[7] and bribery.[8]  These statutes, however, only apply to offenses committed in the course of federal proceedings. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 3:30 am by Editors
Looking for insights and tips as you guide your in-house career? [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 12:27 pm by Elliot Setzer
David Berger, the commandant of the Marine Corps. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am by Eric Goldman
Universal Music Corp., 801 F.3d 1126, 1132-33 (9th Cir. 2015) (holding that the DMCA requires copyright owners to consider fair use before issuing a takedown notice under § 512). [read post]