Search for: "D. Moore" Results 941 - 960 of 2,424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2010, 12:08 pm by Joe Consumer
  Potter continued: WENDELL POTTER: At one point during a strategy meeting, one of the people from APCO said that if our efforts, our initial efforts, were not successful, then we’d have to move to an element of the campaign to push Michael Moore off a cliff…” Not literally, of course. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 4:03 pm by Kevin Poulsen
This week, MSNBC Countdown host Keith Olbermann fled Twitter as a backlash erupted over a segment featuring filmmaker Michael Moore, who’d posted a portion of Assange’s bail. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:20 am by John L. Welch
Moore, Opposition No. 91192733 [Sections 2(d) and 43(c) (blurring) opposition to VIRGINFARMS & Design for "agricultural grains for planting; agricultural seeds; bulbs for agricultural purposes; plantable seed paper comprised primarily of seeds for agricultural purposes; seeds for agricultural purposes; spores and spawn; unprocessed seeds for agricultural use" [VIRGINFARMS disclaimed] in view of the allegedly famous mark VIRGIN for various goods and services].April… [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 8:27 pm by Aaron Moss
Sam Moore (2017), Photo by Gage Skidmore (CC BY-SA 3.0)Moore’s declaration goes further, addressing the plaintiffs’ assertion that Hayes would not have approved of the song’s use in a Republican campaign. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
” — “You’d think that the brilliant brains running America’s shiniest institutions would get it right by now. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 8:08 am by Dan Bressler
Found some fresh and some older but still interesting examples I thought I’d share today. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:54 pm by Otto Spijkers
Alain Pellet (University Paris Ouest, Nanterre-La Défense), Professor Alan Boyle (University of Edinburgh), Professor Lori Damrosch (Columbia Law School), and Professor Joe Verhoeven (Université Paris II). [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 7:15 pm
Were that all, if this were simply a case of disagreement, there'd be nothing to note here. [read post]