Search for: "District of Columbia v. Heller" Results 941 - 960 of 1,016
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2023, 4:45 am by jonathanturley
In making the argument, Hunter will have to claim that references to gun ownership by “law-abiding citizens” in past cases like District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 7:26 am by jonathanturley
When she was the San Fransisco District Attorney, Kamala Harris was one of the signatories on the District Attorneys’ amicus brief in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
Heller, shown in its entirety: We consider whether a District of Columbia prohibition on the possession of usable handguns in the home violates the Second Amendment to the Constitution. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Chicago and District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sure, Justice Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia versus Heller makes it clear that legislators canconstitutionally constrain guns under many conditions, but that may be a very 2008, view. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm by Josh Blackman
Judge Silberman alleged that Judge Sullivan (D.D.C.) should not be able to sit on the District of Columbia's judicial selection committee. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
District of ColumbiaInformal interviews are allowed in the District of Columbia. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:18 pm by Adam Gillette
If one wants to get rid of the individual right to bear arms, one should work to repeal the Second Amendment rather than hoping that the Supreme Court will overturn its decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 10:05 am
But when it comes to reaffirming the sensitive places analysis that Justice Thomas had previously signed onto when he joined the Court's opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
With the fifth justice, it would no longer be futile.We can expect that the new Court will promptly overrule Citizens United, and with it the argument that the government cannot ban political pamphlets.The Second Amendment, as currently interpreted in District of Columbia v. [read post]