Search for: "Doe, et al v. V of T, et al"
Results 941 - 960
of 3,428
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2013, 2:07 pm
Plaintiffs’ judgment was entered under § 1605(a)(7), and retroactive conversion of Plaintiffs’ judgment would violate separation of powers.The case of Jenny Rubin, et al. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 12:48 pm
ET AL v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:38 am
Judge Janice Rogers Brown dissented from the ruling, arguing that FERC does not have the authority to take action to reduce the greenhouse gas impact of pipelines it approves, and thus is not obligated to analyze some impacts, stating “[t]he truth is that FERC has no control over whether the power plants that will emit these greenhouse gases will come into existence or remain in operation” (Sierra Club et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Ville de Montréal (Service de police de la Ville de Montréal), 2018 QCCS 5639 [23] En raison de la position prise par la Ville de Montréal dès le début du dossier et de son comportement depuis, la présente demande en irrecevabilité est manifestement mal fondée, déraisonnable et abusive au sens de l’article 54 C.p.c.[11]. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 4:15 am
” Here is the opinion: Woulfe et al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
Guidelines used to determine if an entity is a “public body that is performing a governmental function” for the purposes of the Open Meetings LawThomas, et al. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2016 NY Slip Op 06989, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe New York City Department of Education [DOE] appealed an order and judgment handed down by Supreme Court, New York County, granting a petition filed by Michael P. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 12:27 pm
The case is entitled Heffelfinger et al. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:31 am
Esther Salas in FTC v Wyndham, et al: See Am. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 6:00 pm
HISTORIC CLASS-ACTION DECISION RELEASEDOn September 15, 2022, City Limits reported on a recent New York County Supreme Court decision which may ultimately benefit some 2000 Harlem tenants.The case - - Maddicks et al. v 106-108 Convent BCR, LLC - - involves eleven (11) buildings that are part of the Big City Realty/Magnolia Holdings portfolio. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:31 am
Esther Salas in FTC v Wyndham, et al: See Am. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 1:34 pm
Bertram et al. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:54 am
” Finally, the Court notes that it does not adopt citations in the R&R that do not conform to The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation (Columbia Law Review Ass’n et al. eds., 20th ed. 2015).Yikes.Here’s the R&R and the District Order.Update— both in the comments and in emails/texts, people are criticizing me for posting this public order. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm
Seiko, [1984] 1 S.C.R. 583 · Coca-Cola Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 6:26 pm
Graham, and V. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
Does such a predisposition exist with wine and cheese, particularly in those parts of Canada where they are available in the same store? [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 3:31 pm
Schwartz, et al. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 10:27 am
Rosenthal et al. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:54 pm
The first was Vision One, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 1:56 pm
Related Articles From Our Blog Gandy v Camp Thurman: Trespassing and Texas Premises Liability Law The Estate Of Marc Palotay et al v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 5:25 pm
Related Cases: California Net Neutrality Cases - American Cable Association, et al v. [read post]
