Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,080
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2010, 12:26 pm
Specifically, we are happy to report about a fine example of a federal court applying common sense, in Hale v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm
In the House of Lords case of Majrowski v Guys and St Thomas’s [2007] 1 AC 224, Baroness Hale said: “All sorts of conduct may amount to harassment. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:12 am
Although the Supreme Court previously stated, in Faretta v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:39 am
Hale, No. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:23 pm
In the immediate years after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Too Much Media v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
In the case of Too Much Media v Hale the New Jersey ruled this week that blogger Shellee Hale was not a journalist entitled to protect confidential sources and newsgathering information under the State’s “shield law”. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:31 am
See Etchieson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:22 am
SHELLE HALE, __ N.J. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm
On April 19, 2010, the Fourth District Court of Appeal issued two opinions – Hale v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(Just to give one example, the Federal Circuit cited Roe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 11:50 am
OneScreen, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 11:22 pm
Marshall v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
In that spirit, Roberts last week denounced President Obama’s criticism of the Court in his State of the Union address, saying that the occasion had “degenerated to a political pep rally. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
Hale (213) 617-5513 chale@sheppardmullin.com [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
He had successfully resisted an extradition order sought by the United States on the grounds that price-fixing in the UK was not illegal (Norris v United States (2008) UKHL 16, (2008) 1 AC 920). [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
But even in criminal proceedings account must be taken of the article 8 rights of the perceived victim: see SN v Sweden, App no 34209/96, 2 July 2002. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 8:32 am
One of my favorite teaching cases is FDIC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:05 am
In the present case there were many instances – none of which the Court of Appeal appear to have noticed – of harm being done by prosecuting counsel and not being undone or even mitigated by the trial judge.It was said by no less a judge than Sir Mathew Hale (in The Trial of the Witches at Bury St Edmund’s (1665) 6 State Trials 647 at p.702) that “to condemn the innocent, and to let the guilty go free, were both abominations”. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:13 pm
The holding of the Fifth Circuit was that the Bankruptcy statute of limitations, contained in Section 108(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (two years) preempted the one year Louisiana statute of limitations for legal malpractice.The underlying action was a multi-million dollar judgment against Gary Eugene Hale, which forced him into bankruptcy. [read post]
