Search for: "Hamilton v. United States" Results 941 - 960 of 1,117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Constitution which provides that, “The United States shall … protect each [state] against invasion. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 11:17 am
Supreme Court, about why the Framers of the United States Constitution gave the Senate the sole power to try impeachments:The Framers labored over the question of where the impeachment power should lie. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Just this week, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in First American Financial Corp. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:39 am by Atty. Gregory A. Holbus
And again, this generally arises from lack of clear definition of disposable income in the bankruptcy code.On Monday, November 2, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Jan Hamilton v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 8:15 pm by JB
Finally, the Sixteenth Amendment speaks of taxes on income.In United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In the United States following the Revolutionary War, liberties were jealously guarded by the states. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:39 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, which interprets a clause in the Internal Revenue Code and holds that to convict a defendant under the “Omnibus Clause,” the government must prove the defendant was aware of a pending tax-related proceeding, such as an investigation or audit, or could foresee such a proceeding. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am by Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter
Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States §962, p. 434 (1833) (“the taxing power is often, very often, applied for other purposes, than revenue”). [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm by Bexis
  There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am by Asheesh Agarwal
  In the past, of course, the agencies have stated that “the vast majority of mergers are either procompetitive and enhance consumer welfare or are competitively benign”[5] and that “[m]ergers are one means by which firms can improve their ability to compete. [read post]