Search for: "In re P. Children"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
S. 562, 575 (1906); see also In re Burrus, 136 U. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 7:38 am
Just as children are reflections of their parents, pets can be viewed as extensions of the household from which they come. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 8:03 pm
I am starting research on the role of the Chinese Communist Party within private and public companies in China, and eventually, on the role of the CCP in Chinese companies operating abroad. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 2:05 pm
Marsalee P. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
(“Daubert II”)(holding that for epidemiological testimony to be admissible to prove specific causation, there must have been a relative risk for the plaintiff of greater than 2) (“For an epidemiological study to show causation under a preponderance standard … the study must how that children whose mothers took Bendectin are more than twice as likely to develop limb reduction birth defects as children whose mothers did not. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 4:19 pm
I have started looking up old Louisville Courier-Journal articles for members of the Brandeis and Harlan families, with the goal of posting here anything interesting I find. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:57 am
Forty percent of children under five years of age with recognized E. coli infections were diagnosed with hemolytic uremic syndrome. [read post]
16 May 2013, 9:22 pm
Forty percent of children under five years of age with recognized E. coli infections were diagnosed with hemolytic uremic syndrome. [read post]
5 May 2013, 7:17 am
Balkin: you’re about what we owe to each other, I’m talking about culture. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
Comments: If we’re serious about this duty, will Google ever fail this test? [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:49 am
Meanwhile, on September 20, 2012, Petitioner applied to the Italian court for an order directing the Respondent to return with the children to Italy and provisions for visitation with the children. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:43 pm
P. 41(a)(2). [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 10:18 am
P! [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm
P. 41(a)(2). [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:03 pm
From claiming that this case “involves accretion and conscripting other people’s children to grow the tribal population based solely on biological link” (p. 19, lines 16-18) to her comment about the white adoptive parents being at “the back of the bus” (page 62 line 20), she pushed so much anti-tribal and racial animus claims it is hard to keep up. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
Preface by Leslie P. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 5:20 am
Keep in mind that these cases are very facts and circumstances dependent so be sure to check with your tax advisor if you’re not sure how to proceed. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:14 am
J is for Junk Fees K is for Kidnapped Children L is for Life Insurance M is for Miscellaneous Income N is for Notice of Deficiency O is for Ordering Rules P is for Passive Activity Rules Q is for 1099-Q R is for Recapture (Alimony) S is for Statute of Limitations T is for Tenancy and Joint Ownership U is for Unrealized Gains and Losses V is for Voluntary Disclosure W is for Worker’s Compensation X is for Mutual Funds – Want more taxgirl goodness? [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 8:18 am
J is for Junk Fees K is for Kidnapped Children L is for Life Insurance M is for Miscellaneous Income N is for Notice of Deficiency O is for Ordering Rules P is for Passive Activity Rules Q is for 1099-Q R is for Recapture (Alimony) S is for Statute of Limitations T is for Tenancy and Joint Ownership U is for Unrealized Gains and Losses V is for Voluntary Disclosure W is for Worker’s Compensation – Want more taxgirl goodness? [read post]