Search for: "In re Richardson" Results 941 - 960 of 988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Sovereign Immunity, Absolute Immunity, Qualified Immunity, Use Immunity, Transaction Immunity and Qualified Privilege claims that may be advanced by public officers and employees involved in litigation and, or, administrative hearingsBelow is an example of the material posted on NYPPL. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Back in 2009 – when the blog was still a Bexis/Herrmann operation – we wrote a catch-all punitive damages post entitled (oddly enough) “On Punitive Damages. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Brian Tamanaha, Soliciting Nominations for the Cox-Richardson-Ruckleshaus Award (Mar. 15, 2006)22. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
With the exception of a few evidence scholars, Federal Rule of Evidence 703 is ignored or misunderstood in practice. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:00 am by Tom Joscelyn
Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and James Comer (R-Ky.), Chairman of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee,  recently announced their intent to arrange for a congressional delegation to visit January 6th inmates held in the Washington, D.C. jail. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 7:11 am by Phil Dixon
After failing the first test, the plaintiff was provided an opportunity to re-test. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 2:54 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers frustrated with the current Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) rules defining what forms of payment employers must count as part of an employee’s “regular rate” when calculating overtime should evaluate and consider expressing support for the Department of Labor’s proposal announced today (March 28, 2019) to update its more than 50-year old regulations implementing the regular rate requirements under section 7(e) of FLSA  in 29… [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
U.S. businesses should move quickly to express strong support for the Joint Employer Status under the Fair Labor Standards Act Rule proposed by the Department of Labor today to help reduce their exposure to liability to pay overtime or other liabilities of subcontractors or other businesses under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Richardson, No. 06-2506 "Conviction and sentence on drug and weapons charges are affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) the district court erred in refusing to sever several of the charges; 2) the district court erred in admitting extrinsic evidence of an alleged prior inconsistent statement; 3) the district court erroneously denied his motion to suppress drugs seized during an inventory search of his vehicle; 4) the district court erred in sentencing him as a career… [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am by Phil Dixon
The trial judge stated: “I read your submissions carefully, and it’s obvious to me that you’re not a sophisticated person as far as your knowledge of the law. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Steps advisable as part of this process include, but are not necessarily limited to: Audit of each position current classified as exempt to assess its continued sustainability and to develop documentation justifying that characterization; Audit characterization of workers obtained from staffing, employee leasing, independent contractor and other arrangements and implement contractual and other oversight arrangements to minimize risks that these relationships could create if workers… [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Antonin Pribetic
  Based upon the principles of finality (res judicata and estoppel) and certainty, once a judgment has been rendered by a foreign court, a Canadian court cannot look into the merits. [read post]