Search for: "Johnson v. Feder" Results 941 - 960 of 4,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2019, 10:02 am by Kent Scheidegger
Tanvir, No. 19-71, regarding a civil suit against federal employees for putting the plaintiffs on the "do not fly" list, allegedly in violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.Among the cases turned down today was Johnson v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 3:48 am by SHG
Johnson, of Brooklyn College, who closely tracks Title IX litigation. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am by Richard Hunt
The defendants attacked the plaintiff’s standing without success in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:50 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Johnson has been working with his Senate Judiciary counterparts to rewrite federal patent eligibility law.The U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Unlike Justice William Johnson’s Gibbons concurrence, Marshall hedges his bets on whether the federal commerce power is exclusive or concurrent. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am by skelly
However, this failure to update direct insurance procurement tax laws may literally prove costly, as illustrated under the recently decided New Jersey Tax Court case, Johnson & Johnson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:05 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
GREAT FOR CUSTOMERS. 5879382 D A 5879329 FOR LIFE’S GREATEST MOMENTS 5879212 NICO MYRIAD 5879063 5878923 VERTIPOD 5878879 COINDEX 5878873 DRIVE1USA 5878831 TIEGAMENATION ENTERTAINMENT 5878618 EIGHT BALL ADVENTURE GEAR 8 DESIGNED FOR HARD USE WHEN YOU’RE BEHIND THE EIGHT BALL 5878594 AGRI-GREEN 5878567 5881513 GOLDFORK 5878245 IWU 5881472 POWER PLUS 5878072 PINE2POSH 5881670 ELKHART HEALTH & AQUATICS 5881661 VETERANS FOR VETERANS MEMORIAL 5878023 VITALITY GO 5878022 VITALITY PLUS… [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 6:53 pm by Patricia Salkin
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), including the requirement of a final decision. [read post]
While Berger also acknowledges that there is a reasonable argument that Congress needed to pass a statute defining what constitutes an impeachable offense, he argues that in the absence of federal common law, the Senate’s decision to hear impeachment cases in the past is a tacit rejection of the position that “high crimes and misdemeanors” requires precise congressional definition. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Supreme Court later held that the Tenure Act as unconstitutional in Myers v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am by INFORRM
The European Court of Human Rights in Gürbüz and Bayar v. [read post]