Search for: "Kerr v. Kerr"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
Strickland v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Reed agrees with Lord Kerr. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
Causation goes to damages, not to liability (Kambadzi per Lord Hope at §54; Lady Hale at §§73-74; Lord Kerr at §88). [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm
Kerr is the Frances R. and John J. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:03 am
(The petition, in Rosario v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:38 am
SCOTUS decided United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm
Hoffman v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:45 am
The 10th Circuit's recent 2-1 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:44 pm
Kerr 700 FEATURE American Needle v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 3:18 pm
See Daubert v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes agreed with Lady Hale. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 5:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sarkar v West London Mental Health NHS Trust [2010] EWCA Civ 289 (19 March 2010) Maroudas v Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 280 (18 March 2010) Connor v Surrey County Council [2010] EWCA Civ 286 (18 March 2010) William Hare Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 283 (18 March 2010) Bloomsbury International Ltd & Ors. v The Sea Fish Industry Authority & Anor… [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 pm
Notably, Payton v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 12:41 pm
Ganias, and the Fifth Circuit's ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:05 am
On 5th May, a seven Justice Supreme Court, comprising Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke and, reflecting, coincidentally, the changes confirmed earlier this week, Lord Collins (who will shortly retire) and Lord Justice Wilson (who, on this occasion will sit as an acting Justice but who will be sworn in as a full time Justice on 26th May), will consider this issue in the case of R v Waya [2010] EWCA Crim 412. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:17 am
[POL roundup; Santa Clara v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:05 am
Despite my admiration for Orin Kerr's mix of scholarship and practicality, one area where I disagree strongly with him is his "technology neutral" approach to search and seizure, where he essentially seeks to apply the law developed over the years to deal with brick and mortar, car chases and snail mail, to the digital world by analogy. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:34 pm
As the ACLU has argued in ACLU v. [read post]
