Search for: "LAWS v. FISHER"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2014, 9:05 pm
Thumbing nose at Hill, Interior Dept. moves to tribalize native Hawaiians by decree [Ilya Shapiro, NACRP, related PDF, Hawaii Free Press, also, background] Cellphone 911: “Safety Mandates That May Reduce Safety” [Coyote] Liability-expanding California decision: knowing breach of a material contractual provision may trigger state False Claims Act [Sidley] Plus Chamber’s ILR on state False Claims Acts and more; Feds to GM: write smoking-gun memos for trial lawyers’… [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:58 pm
Golden cites the Federal Circuit’s recognition of the Utility Examination Guidelines in Fisher and Enzo as examples of the PTO's success in influencing substantive patent law. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:19 am
Fisher, a law professor at Stanford, is that Supreme Court decisions are parsed by judges and scholars with exceptional care. [read post]
25 May 2014, 4:04 am
Fisher v Howard De Walden Estate Ltd RAP/19/2013 is that rare thing – a citeable permission to appeal decision from the UT(LC) (remembering that in Re Bradmoss [2012] UKUT 3 (LC), the UT(LC) had disapproved of reliance on permission decisions, see our brief note, here). [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:39 am
” In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:23 am
"All this is compliant with the GAT and Folien decisions and the Corte di Cassazione ruling, as well the UK decision in Joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) and Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [here]. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:47 am
Stanford law professor Jeffrey L. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:34 am
Stockwell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
Supreme Court granted cert in Yates v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:49 am
Supreme Court frequent flyer Jeffrey Fisher of Stanford Law will be representing Heien. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm
Fisher, with thirty minutes of time.. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, upheld the University of Michigan’s consideration of race in its law school admissions policy (Grutter v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,415). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:54 am
The end result is that the consideration of race in college admissions is still permissible under certain circumstances, as the Court recently reaffirmed in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:10 am
Driehaus, a challenge to an Ohio law that criminalizes false statements during a political campaign, followed by ABC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:02 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:04 pm
What the Court said The Court noted that unlike its 2013 decision in Fisher v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
” Fisher v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am
He remembers that it came from a group of law librarians. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
– Fisher v. [read post]
