Search for: "Law v. Phillips" Results 941 - 960 of 2,757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
A year ago, the FTC’s administrative law judge ruled in favor of the FTC, holding that 1-800 Contacts engaged in anti-competitive behavior. 1-800 Contacts appealed the case to the full Commission. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 10:26 am
  Extrinsic evidence is a secondary source and, as Birss J summarized Phillips v AWH Corp 415 F.3d 1303 (Feb Cir 2005), "may be less significant than the intrinsic record in determining the legally operative meaning of the claim language...Care must therefore be taken... [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
At Virginia Law Weekly, Brock Phillips argues that Garland’s confirmation would be beneficial for both President Barack Obama and Senate Republicans. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:24 am by Orin Kerr
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm by axd10
The Manageable Nationwide Class: A Choice-of-law Legacy of Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:23 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Phillips, 455 U.S. 209, 215–17 (1982), a point Chief Judge Batchelder stressed in her concurrence.I don’t know the case law in this area to know which side offers the better interpretation of the Supreme Court’s precedent or how such ex parte communications should be handled. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:45 am by NCC Staff
Jack Phillips and his wife own a business in Colorado, where as a cake artist Phillips designs cakes. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:19 am
Defendants met their burden by establishing as a matter of law that they, inter alia, were not negligent and that plaintiff sustained no damages, two essential elements of a legal malpractice cause of action (see Oot v Arno, 275 AD2d 1023, 713 N.Y.S.2d 382), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Ginther v Heim [appeal No. 1], AD3d , 2008 NY Slip Op 7430, 2008 N.Y. [read post]