Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 941 - 960
of 13,517
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2023, 2:14 pm
The case is Ciminelli v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:55 am
” Footnote 18 to the opinion tries to draw a line at age 18 discussing the fact that people under that age are not part of the ”political community. [read post]
10 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Do our rules and our values appear to be in line? [read post]
10 May 2023, 2:30 pm
From Collins v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 1:55 pm
Lost in translation: Absence of domestic implementation of international norms for the Indigenous Peoples of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
People with access to high-quality information will get ahead. [read post]
9 May 2023, 7:33 am
–Kuklinski v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 2:29 pm
Jack also interviewed me on his blog about my books Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom and The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
But Calabresi’s work receives mention, too, as “a separate, fruitful line of intellectual exploration” (TLE 84). [read post]
7 May 2023, 10:05 am
THE FACTS On 26 January 2015, an F-16D Fighting Falcon jet fighter of the Hellenic Air Force crashed into the flight line at Los Llanos Air Base in Albacete, Spain, killing 11 people: the two crew members and nine on the ground. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
That women are the peculiar bearers of America’s constitutional failings seems obvious after Dobbs v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm
I don't think anything in the Stevens papers is likely to persuade many people to change their minds about the case. [read post]
4 May 2023, 11:54 am
And in Doe v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallTwenty years ago, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the following in Grutter v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
”[v]The release does not explain what such a response would entail, which is not surprising given that the SEC is neither equipped nor authorized to tell private funds how to manage their risks, let alone to rescue private funds in times of stress. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:43 am
The People elicited the testimony of several of the people who had been involved in the fighting. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:39 am
Passman v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:07 am
The recent case of Byrne v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 5:36 am
In 2015 in Michigan v. [read post]
