Search for: "Matter of Smith v Smith" Results 941 - 960 of 4,654
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2013, 5:41 am by Benjamin Wittes
On the merits, I agree with Judge Pauley that—at the lower court level, at least—there is just no way around the fact that Smith v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:22 pm
And the six judges on the majority, who found that there was both a violation and no qualified immunity, admittedly consisted of a Carter appointee (Judge Pregerson) and three Clinton appointees (Judges Wardlaw, Fisher, and Paez), but it was the swing votes of two of the most recent Bush II appointees -- the Judges Smith -- that made the difference.Yes, draws matter. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:35 am by Bexis
  We rated the decision that the Texas Supreme Court just reversed, Centocor, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
When I think about it more deeply, it seems to me that the FLSA essentially says that, as a matter of law (or at least legal principles), when you work more than 8 hours in a day, it is more burdensome, and as a result the employer must pay you more. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:15 am
While Detective Smith did not mention the potential for child pornography purchases, he was not required to provide defendant with every piece of information that he possessed while investigating the matter. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 2:28 pm
Everyone on the panel -- Judge Alarcon (who authors the opinion), Judge Milan Smith, and Judge Hurwitz -- is on board for this one. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 12:11 pm by Phil Dixon
Summaries will also be posted to Smith’s Case Compendium, here. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 10:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Recent decisions by Administrative Law Judges of the NYC Office of Administrative Trials and HearingsHuman Resources Administration v Smart, OATH Index No. 1325/16NYC Dept. of Transportation v Harris, OATH Index No. 1531/16 Matter of Smart: In the Smart case, OATH Administrative Law Judge Kevin F. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by Bruce Ackerman
It is for this reason that Smith v. [read post]