Search for: "May v. State"
Results 941 - 960
of 119,413
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2021, 7:06 am
May 11, 2021) The post Facebook’s “Russia State-Controlled Media” Disclosure Doesn’t Violate the Lanham Act–Maffick v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:38 am
McAllister was tried on May 13, 2015 in ... [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 7:36 am
Criminal procedure — Motion to modify sentence — Appealability Following trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City in May 1991, a jury found Renard McClain, appellant, guilty of first-degree murder and carrying a deadly weapon. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 5:45 am
On May 20, 2014, Williams filed a motion to correct illegal sentence, related to his 1995 conviction for distribution and possession of ... [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:14 pm
Criminal procedure — Motion to modify sentence — Five-year deadline In this appeal, we must decide whether a circuit court may exercise its fundamental jurisdiction to grant a timely-filed motion for modification of sentence after the five-year deadline set forth in Maryland Rule 4-345(e)(1) has lapsed. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am
On 23 November 2015 the Supreme Court heard a two day appeal of the decision in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 1608. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 8:53 pm
The main dispute in Moore v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
It considers how the state immunity revolution came to an end, continuing threats to the Seminole Tribe paradigm posed by recent decisions like Torres v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:58 am
The Ohio Supreme Court ruled yesterday that strip mining may be permissible in Ohio's state parks and other wildlife areas, according to an article in the Columbus Dispatch. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 7:26 am
This week, in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:43 am
Q (Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] WLR (D) 176 “It was not the case that section 72(9)(b) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 only applied if the Secretary of State had notified the applicant that he had issued a certificate under the section. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:03 pm
I think the California Supreme Court may well say "No. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:24 am
" (American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:46 am
Kisor v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:38 am
My new column at The Hill explains the parallels between the recent SCOTUS opinion overruling Roe v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:19 pm
Moore v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 4:18 am
United States (W.D. [read post]
14 May 2017, 1:56 pm
On May 14, 1973, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Frontiero v. [read post]
