Search for: "People v. Drew" Results 941 - 960 of 1,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  TM supposedly drew this line until recently: if people are being confused it’s illegal and if not it’s not. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Yesterday, airstrikes struck a refugee camp in the northern Syrian province of Idlib, killing more than 30 people. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Cyprien Fluzin
Although the decision drew strong criticism, the government went ahead after unsuccessful legal challenges. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am by INFORRM
For example, in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2009] EWHC 2779 (QB) (Sharp J), the alleged libel was a diary item in the Telegraph which quoted the claimant as saying that she was not a “veggie” and did not “have much time” for people like the McCartneys and Annie Lennox. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Schachtman
Clapp’s study and the conclusions he drew from it are unreliable because they failed to comply with four factors or criteria for drawing causal interferences from epidemiological studies: accounting for known confounders … . [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 5:00 pm
A promise to keep on doing what drew the ire of the Justice Department. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The use of purpose and context are debated, as one would expect, but it is nonetheless uncontroversial that statutory context can include relevant international law instruments and soft law and may extend to the values underpinning the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the constitutional imperative of reconciliation with Indigenous peoples. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Her dissent drew deeply from originalist theory and sources similar to Justice Scalia’s majority opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
  Until 2013, when the Supreme Court issued its decision in a case called Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:41 am
After much national and international uproar at these blatant violations of human rights, the Supreme Court finally ruled five to three in Hamdan v. [read post]