Search for: "People v. Sharp" Results 941 - 960 of 1,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Tunheim thinks it fair to say that no court system in the world offers as many people as easy access to as many documents as is offered by PACER. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm by David Lat
Of the 1,400 people who have voted thus far in our reader poll, only 34 percent would vote “guilty” if they were jurors in the case of State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:01 pm by Amy Howe
  Let’s talk about today’s decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 5:39 am
Scalis’s most significant opinion on the issue remains Lujan v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 12:18 am by INFORRM
  It also suggested that the range of freedom of expression had to be interpreted more restrictively when dealing with people who were not political figures or exercising some public function. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:31 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgment after a public hearing remains outstanding: El Diwany v Ministry of Justice & the Police, Norway, heard 16 March 2011 (Sharp J). [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Colin Lachance
When you read R. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Of course, there is the reality that the Constitution was designed by people who were profoundly antagonistic to the notion of “democracy” inasmuch as that required some genuine faith in the capacity of ordinary people to engage in what Federalist 1 described as “reflection and choice” about how we should in fact be governed. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 12:00 am by Michael Scutt
It stands at the centre of the bosses v workers, capital v labour, rich v poor divide and is frequently pressed into service by those who have a political agenda on one side or the other. [read post]