Search for: "RICHARD M. THOMAS" Results 941 - 960 of 1,254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
Answer: I’m sure there will be people who disagree, but the answer is “yes. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 2:21 am
Read the DCA's response to Maurice's request and the Appeal Round up of some of the further coverage and debate Martin at the BBC Open Secrets blog has also made some useful obervations about the Frontier economics report: -False economies -Always read the footnotes -Costing the maximum or maximising the cost The Times has made available the full transcript of a long interview with Richard Thomas, he is asked a question about fees: Q: Where are we on the… [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:47 pm by lawmrh
‘If you rule this way, I’m not going to invite you to a State dinner’? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:52 pm
Richard Thomas, the UK's former Information Commissioner, despaired that this verdict was giving privacy a bad name. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
Federal Court Involvement in Supervised Release June 28, 2021 | Richard M. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm by Adam Thierer
Berin Szoka, Mark Adams, Howard Beales, Thomas Lenard & Jules Polonetsky, Progress on Point 16.22, Oct. 30, 2009. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:59 am by Emma Snell
Evan Gershkovich, Thomas Grove and Alan Cullison report for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
In talc exposure litigation of ovarian cancer claims, plaintiffs were struggling to show that cosmetic talc use caused ovarian cancer, despite missteps by the defense.[1] And then lawsuit industrialist Mark Lanier entered the fray and offered a meretriciously beguiling move: Stop trying talc cases and start trying asbestos cases. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am by Schachtman
I saw CERT file amicus briefs in legal cases, which is not the typical activity of a scientific research organization.10 Even more curious, and somewhat dubious, in two cases in which Ralphael Metzger of the Metzger Law Group represented the plaintiffs, another firm, Richard Alexander of the Alexander Law Group, represented CERT as an amicus in the same cases.11 Given the publicity created by CERT’s victory in its Proposition 65 citizen’s action against Starbucks, I recently… [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
On 27 January 2020 the Government published its response to the Cairncross Review on its website. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
  As the Supreme Court observed, albeit not in the product liability context, “[m]eaningful disclosure does not mean more disclosure. [read post]