Search for: "ROMANS v. ROMANS" Results 941 - 960 of 1,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Como parte de una serie especial, dirigida a conocer el perfil de los candidatos a las Elecciones 2018 del Colegio de Abogados y Abogadas de Puerto Rico (CAAPR), Microjuris.com entrevistó al Lcdo. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:24 am by Anthony Fairclough
Update In the recent case of JGE v The Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938, the Court of Appeal held that a bishop could be held vicariously liable for abuse carried out by a parish priest. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:58 am
This judgment is within the scope of reasoning in Louis Vuitton v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 3:30 am by Howard Friedman
The government isn’t violating Notre Dame’s right to free exercise of religion by letting it opt out, or by arranging for third party contraception coverage.Rick Garnett comments briefly on the decision at Mirror of Justice.Meanwhile, the D.C. federal district court handed down a much longer (94 pages), more complicated and nuanced decision in Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
 The verbal description of the mark states: "The mark consists of a three dimensional ivory-coloured tile on the top surface of which is shown a letter of the Roman alphabet and a number in the range of 1 to 10". [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
We’ve previously discussed the Illinois appellate court’s 2013 decision in Fifield v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Often the “empire” in question referred to the Holy Roman Empire, founded by Charlemagne, but which (in Voltaire’s mot juste) was neither holy, Roman, nor an empire. [read post]