Search for: "Response Brief for the United States Regarding Jurisdiction" Results 941 - 960 of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 24 February 2022, the Court of Appeal refused all fifteen grounds of appeal in Cheng v Pan; Cheng v Zhou [2022] NSWCA 21. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:16 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
They ventilated the unit, but there was no fire present. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 7:40 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Claire Vishik
Moran, Theodore H., CFIUS and National Security: Challenges for the United States, Opportunities for the European Union (Washington, D.C.: Peterson Institute for International Economi [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In so doing, the Court accepted an argument that the plaintiffs had made only in a footnote in their brief. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:34 am
The purpose of this brief is to provide an overview of the multiple roles that law enforcement can play in increasing public safety and reducing sexual victimization through sex offender management efforts. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:47 pm by Chuck Ramsay
Correspondence and other materials will only be accepted if they are in regards to general administrative matters. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
In the post that follows, I aim to provide a brief overview of KBR v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
On its face, the scope of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Mazars was relatively limited: The case concerned the particular separation-of-powers issues raised by congressional subpoenas for private material regarding the sitting president. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Bhushan NALSAR University of Law Abstract: In current academic literature India has been subject to much criticism for not being an arbitration friendly jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:18 am by Kevin LaCroix
” Under this language, a finding that multiple smaller claims are unrelated could leave the policyholder responsible for multiple policy retentions and render much of the loss deriving from the various claims as uninsured. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am by Legal Beagle
Proceedings in the Sheriff Court# When the applicant refused to pay the council for his share of the repair costs, the council brought proceedings in the Sheriff Court (the civil court of general jurisdiction). [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm by Steven Hansen
Yamaha-Japan then filed this petition for writ of mandate, and it is supported by a brief from the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers.II. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 9:00 am by Jack Goldsmith
This non-uniformity is likely not fixable by the director of national intelligence (whose jurisdiction is basically limited to the IC). [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:19 pm
  Pix credit hereThe United States and its allies gifted Ukraine much by way of moral support, assurances, and lots of military and humanitarian goods and services. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am by Phil Dixon
  Because the claims were not properly raised in the plaintiff’s pro se brief, they were waived on appeal. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae at 17 (submission of nine hundred references without any indication which ones were most relevant); Brief of the Biotechnology Industry Organization as Amicus Curiae at 7 (submission of eight- een pages of cited references, including five pages listing references to claims, office actions, declarations, amend- ments, interview summaries, and other communications in related applications). [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Charles L. Black, Jr.
Black published an extraordinary brief volume, entitled, Impeachment: A Handbook. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm by Chuck Cosson
As with current “fake news” events, the “War of the Worlds” occasion was taken to chide broadcasters about the responsibility of the media to the truth and to the public.[5]  The question of broadcasters’ obligations to the truth and to the public, then as now, rested legally within the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”). [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm by Barry Sookman
 It is, therefore, of great consequence and concern that the California court summarily decided that the order made against Google could not be enforced in the United States. [read post]