Search for: "Screws v. State" Results 941 - 960 of 1,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2012, 5:15 am by admin
Most recently in 2010, in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:33 am by SHG
  Cooper and its companion case, Missouri v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:41 pm by Gene Quinn
If you actually read these patents you will notice that the Background of the Invention is rather long (nearly 4 full columns) and in a post KSR v. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 5:49 am
These relationships are not restricted to the government, but yes to the whole society, through a set of essential practices for the maintenance of the state. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Welcome to a new world, a world where eminent lawyers, housing advisers, landlords and tenants the length and breadth of England screw up their face, glance from one piece of paper to another and blows out it’s collective cheeks. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm by Steve Sady
In this “narrow range of cases,” the sentencing court could examine court documents – the charging instrument and the jury instructions – to determine if the state conviction was for the branch of the relevant crime that matched the generic federal definition of the predicate offense for a “violent felony” under the ACCA. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Member states review key copyright issues (WIPO) (IPKat) (Daily Dose of IP) (Intellectual Property Watch) CFI rejects Lego’s appeal against OHIM’s Board of Appeals decision that Lego brick shape not registrable as a Community trade mark (Class 46) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Law360) Patent policy to be investigated by Federal Trade… [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:00 pm by The Law Office of John Guidry II
  The state’s standing argument didn’t fly, in light of the recent US Supreme Court case of Byrd v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:52 am by Eric Goldman
The law governs users who meet any of the following: resides in the state, does business in the state, or “shares or receives content on a social media platform in this state. [read post]