Search for: "Small v. United States" Results 941 - 960 of 7,751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2015, 4:16 pm by Hannah Kiddoo
He added that one way to ensure that only the guilty are convicted is to uphold the promise of Gideon v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Aliens from these six nations who have never entered the United States, have no relatives in the United States, and have never received any travel document from the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 5:35 am
Scheindlin, of United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, will give the ABA TECHSHOW 2007 Keynote Presentation on Thursday, March 22. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 2:32 pm by Unknown
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Navajo–Hopi Settlement Act; Administrative Procedure Act) United States of America v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:39 pm
Co., Inc., No. 84, 85 "When a contractor has promised to pay its workers the prevailing wages required by the United States Housing Act, the workers may sue under state law to enforce the promise" ETHICS & DISCIPLINARY CODE, ETHICS & PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, PER CURIAM, SANCTIONS In the Matter of Honorable Robert M. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Joel Outten
The United States House of Representatives passed the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act (H.R. 3) by a 251-175 vote last month. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Jareb Gleckel
With a conservative majority on the Supreme Court, the question everybody has been asking is what the future of abortion will look like in the United States. [read post]