Search for: "State of Maine v. Cross"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 6:45 am
Structurally, the draft Directive is organized into five Titles, containing General Provisions (I), rules on CMOs (II), MTL (III), Enforcement Measures (IV), and Reporting and Final Provisions (V). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:24 am
There is nothing modern or nanny-state about the doctrine that make masters liable to society for the wrongdoing of their servants. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:52 am
Since Solvay said Honeywell was also infringing its patent right across Europe, in December 2009 it also sought provisional relief in the form of a cross-border prohibition against infringement until a decision had been made in the main proceedings. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:14 pm
Case Information Marlboro Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
This is the first “main proceedings” decision. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:34 am
Hyder v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
This is the first “main proceedings” decision. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
This is the first “main proceedings” decision. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 10:58 am
See Cook v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:05 pm
The transatlantic travails of celebrities including Justin Timberlake, Britney Spears, Cameron Diaz, Jennifer Lopez and the Jolie-Pitts are listed over 8 pages among others who have crossed the ocean in search of a remedy (as well as one who notoriously asserted his right not to cross it). [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:12 pm
In that decision, all nine judges voted to strike down the Separate but Equal standard, allowing state-sponsored segregation, that had existed since the Plessy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Judgment reserved. 16:06: Re the cross-appeal – the Judges in the Court below were correct to conclude that the cross-appeal had been properly dealt with by the letter the Government sent. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:30 am
In Castonguay Construction (2000) Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:51 am
The first is whether it is unconstitutional for a state to require home-care providers, caring for disabled persons, to pay fees to a union to represent their interests before agencies of state government. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
Napo tell me that: Napo was introduced into Cafcass by the Family Court Welfare Officers who transferred from the Probation Service and it became the largest Trade Union in Cafcass with joint negotiating rights for Family Court Advisers (the main grade practitioners in both Private and Public Law), Service Managers and Family Support Workers. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
A jury, after hearing live testimony and cross-examination, might therefore discredit the officers’ testimony and conclude that, in light of the degree of danger Keith posed once handcuffed, if any, and other pertinent circumstances (including Keith’s apparent physical and mental state at the time), the degree of force used was excessive. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:47 am
First, neither of the main arguments of the plurality appear to have much traction. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:08 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Reproduced with permission from Electronic Commerce & Law Report, (June 13, 2012). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Main Chamber. [read post]
