Search for: "State v. Carbone"
Results 941 - 960
of 1,578
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
The CAFC, in Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:56 pm
Kitroser et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:38 pm
TransFresh Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Luminant Generating Co., LLC, v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 5:58 am
Kansas v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:26 am
In Kitroser et al. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:52 pm
Supreme Court ruled, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:34 am
Industry officials and environmentalists said in interviews that the rule, which comes on the heels of tough new requirements that the Obama administration imposed on mercury emissions and cross-state pollution from utilities within the past year, dooms any proposal to build a coal-fired plant that does not have costly carbon controls. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 3:33 pm
In Kitroser v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 1:16 pm
The dissent argued that the certified order from the Court of Federal Claims did not confer appellate jurisdiction over the earlier dismissal of infringement claims against the United States, citing United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:31 am
Supreme Court found that a state had standing to bring a lawsuit to force the EPA to issue greenhouse gas regulations in Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:33 pm
CiteID=465234Appeal from the District Court of Carbon County, Honorable Wade E. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:03 am
Hirschhorn v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:03 am
Hirschhorn v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 4:20 am
" asks @dorfonlaw pjblack.me/zjl1Ap #lwb242 the fascinating story behind the case: "Lawrence v Texas: How Laws Against Sodomy Became Unconstitutional" pjblack.me/yW6J9C yay! [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:49 am
In Rain CII Carbon, LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:23 am
The rare, two-day argument began with a challenge to EPA's December 7, 2009 finding that emissions of six GHGs, including carbon dioxide, "may reasonably be anticipated both to endanger public health and to endanger public welfare. [read post]
