Search for: "State v. Leon" Results 941 - 960 of 1,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2012, 11:29 am by Benjamin Wittes
Circuit later took a similar view in Doe v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWCA Civ 1073, dismissing by a majority the appeal from the decision of Nicol J, which struck out the Appellant’s claims in libel and data protection as abuse. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Alexander, No. 071780 In a conviction for sale of controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that the state courts unreasonably applied Batson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am by Jon Levitan
In fact, de Leon was recently endorsed by the California Democratic Party in a rebuke to Feinstein. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:52 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979) (records of dialed calls); United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 5:24 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Gómez, Gilberto Guerrero-Rocca, Nicolás Vassallo, María Gabriela De Abreu Negrón, Karen Longaric, & Fabián Villeda Corona, Revisión de laudos arbitrales de inversión 2020: 2º Encuentro Anual (Santiago de Chile, 07-08/06/2021) Lucas Carlos Lima, As medidas cautelares da Corte Internacional de Justiça no caso Ucrânia e Federação Russa Eshan Dauhoo, The Challenges faced by Women Legal Academics (Panel Discussion) … [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:49 am
Both the lenders/ claimants and the borrower/ defendant sought to rely upon the passage in Rainy Sky SA v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am by Jordan Brunner
Director and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said that he had “never been so nervous” in his life “about what may or may not happen in Washington. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:30 am by Lyle Denniston
  In December 1970, the Court split 5-to-4 in the case of Oregon v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]