Search for: "State v. Mart"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2013, 4:23 am
The nongovernmental organisations which are signatories to the Joint Memorandum of Understanding on Fire and Building Safety (dated March 15, 2012), having stated their intention to support the implementation of this programme, shall, at their own election, be signed witnesses to this Agreement. [read post]
17 May 2013, 7:36 am
But since then, in 2011 the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:00 am
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court vacated that decision and ordered the Ninth Circuit to reconsider it in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 1:41 pm
That did change last week when, in Faulkinbury v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:49 am
Judge Harold Baer, Jr. denied class certification (and denied summary judgment) for the interns, relying largely on Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:32 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 575 F.3d 1312, 1330 (Fed. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am
Prone to certification even after Wal-Mart v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 3:06 am
Despite the warnings, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 8:45 pm
Concepcion and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2010 WL 1790864, at *2 (N.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 8:25 am
Even in other states, a plaintiff may prefer FLSA collective actions due to the lower standards for conditional certification and increasing difficulties in obtaining Rule 23 certification in the wake of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:39 am
This case takes its proper place among Wal-Mart v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:39 am
This case takes its proper place among Wal-Mart v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:28 pm
Id. at 18 (citing Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
, Michael Sipos and Gary Smith v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Playing with reality v. paper rights to compromise reflecting different systems. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:15 am
Carson Optical, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 6:34 am
The Bank argued that neither group could be certified as a class because neither group could satisfy the requirement that common issues predominate over individual issues, as explained in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:25 pm
Comcast’s cert petition presented the case as a slam-dunk violation of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:16 pm
” This reasoning, the Court found, contradicted precedent such Wal-Mart v. [read post]
