Search for: "State v. Master" Results 941 - 960 of 3,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 1:39 pm by Christopher Bird
Each week, Wise Law Blog reviews recent decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.Cleveland v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:04 am
Dell, 804 F.2d 796 (2d Cir. 1986), cert denied, 483 U.S. 1020 (1987); Masters v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
As I discussed in a prior post (here), in its March 2012 decision in the Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Limited v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
In a footnote appended to the reference to a “master inquiry search” above, the court explains that a “master inquiry performs a search of a variety of local, state, and federal agencies. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 4:40 am by SHG
Until New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
 ICWA, among other things, allows tribes to intervene in state adoptions of tribal children. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 10:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Where, as here, "the parties agree to submit their dispute to an arbitrator, courts generally play a limited role," citing New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Assn. v State of New York, 94 NY2d 321;2. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by Deborah J. Merritt
United States 1984) and barns (United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:02 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
Attorneys fighting for victims of decades-old child sexual abuse, the March 2023 Third District Court of Appeals’ ruling in Doe v. [read post]