Search for: "State v. Strange"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2016, 7:55 am
The oral argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:19 am
196/11 P, Formula One Licensing BV v OHIM, Global Sports Media Ltd, on an opposition relating to a Community trade mark that was filed a little over eight years ago and which may still have a few more years' mileage to it. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
Open justice requires and means scrutiny of the state. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:26 pm
Jervis v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:10 pm
US v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:57 am
Wake County Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:15 am
According to the verdict slip in Graham v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:19 pm
Direct Shopping Network, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
So this was really a technicality, and quite strange. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 9:12 am
John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 2:09 pm
Selya says it is okay under prejudice and notes that under United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 9:13 am
Even if the owner of bonnanwalt was not identical to the lawyer’s employer, it seems quite strange to consider the lawyer sufficiently independent. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:30 am
These rules vary from state-to-state, and many states haven't clearly defined their legal standards. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Urgent Care Nurses Registry, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 2:04 pm
Brugmann v. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 3:47 pm
That's the basic issue in Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Miglino v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 5:50 am
R. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 12:15 pm
Beyond that, it now accurately identifies all categories of original jurisdiction cases and even provides examples, including the relatively unknown 1892 decision in United States v. [read post]
